When I was just a teen aged kid, I started tracing our genealogy. I had some help from a night class I took, and then I was on my own in the genealogy stacks of the reading room at the American Antiquarian Society in Worcester, Massachusetts. I was lucky because it was the mid-1970s, and I had interviewed my grandparents, who had been born in the 1890s. They knew all about their own parents and grandparents, which took me right to the “Tan Books”. In those days (pre-internet), anyone doing Massachusetts ancestry used the Tan books, which are the published vital records for most of the towns in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Tan books cover from the beginning of vital records in the early 1600s up to 1850.
I was also lucky because the AAS had, and still has, a great collection of compiled genealogies. I was able to find a book on my MUNROE ancestors, and my EMERSONs, and then the CONVERSE family. I carefully compared all the notes and dates to vital records. I was sure that I was on the right track. However, the CONVERSE family had information on the family going back into the eons of time in England. I took it all for granted and added it to my family tree. There was no way of checking information pre-1620 in the Massachusetts Vital Records.
Still on the hunt for proof of my CONVERSE line led me to check the information I previously found with some books on heraldry and peerages. All the Converse information matched, except for the leap from England to Massachusetts in the 1600s. Which is exactly where I found my first case of “trimming the family tree” a few years later. As I advanced in my genealogy research experience, I learned about genealogy journals and using the latest available research. The CONVERSE book I had read was published in the 1800s. Newer information in the NEHGS Register later in the 20thcentury straightened out the line and trimmed off my noble CONVERS line which had led to the knight Sir Roger de Coigneries, companion to William the Conqueror.
Fast forward - in the year 2001 a book was published called The Name’s Familiar II, a second volume of a book by Laura Lee which gives biographies and family histories on the inventors or historical figures who lent their names to brands, inventions, and other commonly used words. This is the book for you if you are curious about the people and names behind CliffsNotes, Bunker Hill, or Converse athletic shoes. You can read this book online at Google Books.
The very first line of the sketch on Marquis Mills Converse, founder of the Converse athletic shoe company, states “…was born October 25, 1861 into a family that traces its lineage all the way back to Edward III of England…”. I wondered if they used his noble heritage in any early advertising. And hey, that CONVERSE name sounded familiar? Marquis Mills Converse turned out to be a relative. To me. Not to any noble King in England. If a fifteen year old could figure out that family history, why couldn't a book author? (Did his parents name him "Marquis" after a mythical royal lineage?)
Did you ever wear a pair of Chuck Taylor basketball shoes? This is the same Converse shoe company, founded in 1908 in Malden, Massachusetts. Our common ancestor, the Puritan Deacon Edward Converse first came to the New World and settled in Charlestown, and then Woburn, Massachusetts. Malden was a great place for this famous sneaker factory since it is right in between the two towns where Deacon Converse lived in the 1600s. These shoes are probably now made in China, but I don't know for sure. Converse sneakers were wildly popular with both basketball players and teenagers in the 1950s and 1960s, until designer athletic shoes became the rage in the 1970s and 1980s. The company is still making athletic shoes, and they are more popular today with skateboarders and red carpet actresses in Hollywood than with NBA athletes.
Here’s the real story!
The Converse Family genealogy:
Richard Convers d. 1542 in Navestock, Essex, England m. Margaret Unknown
John Convers m. Joan Fuller
Anthony Convers m. Clemence Spady
Deacon Edward Converse m. Sarah Parker
b. 1590 Stanford Rivers, Essex, England
d. 10 August 1663 Woburn, Massachusetts
James Converse m. Anna Long Samuel Converse m. Judith Carter
James Converse m. Hannah Carter Samuel Converse m. Dorcas Pain
Robert Converse m. Mary Sawyer Thomas Converse m. Abigail Fay
Susanna Converse m. Caleb Simonds Joel Converse m. Elizabeth Bixby
Ruth Simonds m. Andrew Munroe Marquis Converse m. Electa White
Luther Simonds Munroe m. Olive Flint Peter Mills Converse m. Mary Spear Clement
Phebe Munroe m. Robert W. Wilkinson Marquis Mills Converse m. Alice Houghton Sargent
I Founder of the Converse Shoe Company
Albert M. Wilkinson m. Isabella L. Bill
Donald M. Wilkinson m. Bertha L. Roberts
Slightly inaccurate source:
The Name’s Familiar II, by Laura Lee, Gretna, Louisiana: Pelican Publishing Company, 2001. (See pages 83-84 for the sketch on Marquis Mills Converse)
Better sources for CONVERSE genealogy:
NEHGS Register, Volume 146, pages 130 -132
NEHGS Register, Volume 153, pages 81 - 96
Great Migration Begins, Volume 1, pages 459 - 463
Converse History http://www.insidehoops.com/converse-history.shtml
Converse Shoes official website www.converse.com
Copyright 2013, Heather Wilkinson Rojo
originally published at http://nutfieldgenealogy.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-sneaker-king-marq...