Genealogy Wise

The Genealogy & Family History Social Network

From McCarthy Surname study FTDNA

Yes you are definitely Irish Type II. The mutations  I highlighted are based on an Irish Type II background. The defining Irish Type  II progenitor lived some time in the first millenium A.D. So all Irish Type II  people will have mutations which occurred since then, defining their  sub-branches.
I'm so glad that you have had a successful outcome  in contacting Cummings. As I said previously, " I agree it only needed a generation to omit the "r" in  O'Croimin (or variants!)"; who would have believed that a Cummings might trace  back to MacCarthy?  Do you have the kit number for Cummings? (Save me  searching for it!)
There is no reason at present to suppose you are  NOT descended from a McCarthy lineage.
Irish Type II is unusal in that it does not at  present have any defining SNP (except the very recently identified L1312) beyond  R-DF13 (which is common to many other lineages which do have two or more more  recent defining SNPs).  You could test for DF13 but I am sure you would be  positive for this. Apart from that, it's a case of waiting until the  professionals discover new SNPs (e.g, in the 1000 Genome Project) which are good  candidates.  L1312 has proved positive in  ONE Irish Type II person only. He, however, has a very distinctive haplotype  (i.e mutations away from Irish Type II) and no others as yet to my knowledge  have proven positive for this. Quote from a forum: "L1312 was found using the  V22 primers, which have been around a while, so I was able to re-blast the V22  chromatograms for the three previous Type II Irish (all are variety  13*-1511A-T2*) WTYs. Kits 11211 (O'Donoghue), 115485 (Mahoney), and 179653  (O'Sullivan) are all L1312-."
If you wanted to invest further my recommendation  would be to extend to 111 markers (while the FTDNA current sale is on).   The more (in McCarthy Groups A and B) do this the better chance we have of  working out the tree structures over the past 1000 years.
Kind regards = marked private (refence can be provided)

Views: 269

Comment

You need to be a member of Genealogy Wise to add comments!

Join Genealogy Wise

Comment by Richard Cremeans on March 7, 2013 at 11:19pm

You know i am also related to the Mohney's,Barrett's, and a few others maybe even you I dont know what you want I am sorry

Comment by Richard Cremeans on March 7, 2013 at 11:11pm

I read a post by you sometime ago? ah yeah I did, didnt you say your mom or grandma a Cremeen? Didnt I read that I think on Skibbgirl? Which I have read a lot of your work which I have like and recommended people to visit your site and to think I had to meet you like this, I am sorry again as when I wrote or posted anything I was very new at this writing and writing works,

Comment by Richard Cremeans on March 7, 2013 at 10:59pm

well did I not say I was sorry for that! as I did not realize I did not give you your credit ! or even knowing whos it was Did I not say Forgive me?  Yeah thats my McCarthy Cremeen not Crimeen did you file a complaint?? I never noticed! Never got a notice, I didnt even like that site really had not been on it in awhile, well maybe you could of wrote me a email? I am sure It was there! I sure didnt want to start off on a bad note or step on anyones toes thats for sure I will make especially sure when I post  from now on you will see the source are you ok with that can we move on and get along?

Comment by Richard Cremeans on March 7, 2013 at 10:41pm

go to McCarthy surname colorized its is me second one down in McCarthy group A with three of my real relatives found thru the FTDNA studies

Comment by Susan J. Barretta on March 7, 2013 at 10:34pm

Do you have a user page on Wikipedia?  I have logged a complaint there on the Talk page of a McCarthy-Crimeen user who took data from my research and put it on the page, without acknowledging its source.

I don't care what Nigel says.   It is unprofessional and violates research credibility to post information without citing references.

Comment by Richard Cremeans on March 7, 2013 at 10:30pm

By the way I have my own Surname study for Cremeen sept I am the Admin ask Nigel see what he tells you!

Comment by Richard Cremeans on March 7, 2013 at 10:22pm

It is My name in that title of yours which I did not realize might of been yours and for that I am sorry!

Comment by Richard Cremeans on March 7, 2013 at 10:20pm

Oh by the way that was a copy of a personal letter Nigel emailed to me!

Comment by Richard Cremeans on March 7, 2013 at 10:19pm

Names and Variants:
CREMEEN -- Creemeen, Creemin, Cremeen, Crimeen, Crimmeen,
Crimmin ,Cremeans,Creameans,Cremins,Cromeans Cummings-Carty,MacCarthy
Cremeen,McCarthy

Comment by Richard Cremeans on March 7, 2013 at 10:16pm

I did not give sources because he did not want me too I am very friendly with Nigel I and he are very talkitive and appreaciate him very much and consider him a very good friend ,but you can believe you me that I will always give credit where it is due! Oh if it is Identical I am sorry did not realize that was yours please forgive me! for I am sorry!

I am very much into what I do and am a member of the Mccarthy surname study and many others, I am also envoled in the Genoproject and waiting my deep clad from the GENO 2.0 this well come in a few weeks iam excited! as for the MacCarthy Cremeen/Cremin Sept I am DIFFENTLY a member by DNA, If you see Nigel at the Cork geneagolical McCarty get to gether june 1 and 2 I know he is a feature this year tell him Richard says Hello!

Members

© 2024   Created by IIGSExecDirector.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service